Referendum questions on the November Ballot

NOTICE OF REFERENDUM ELECTION 
November 3, 2026 
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that at an election to be held in the several towns, villages, 
wards, and election districts of the State of Wisconsin, on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, the 
following questions will be submitted to a vote of the people pursuant to law: 
2025 Senate Joint Resolution 116 
To amend section 10(1)(c) of article V; relating to: prohibiting the governor from using the 
partial veto to create or increase any tax or fee. 
Whereas, the 2023 legislature in regular session considered a proposed amendment to the 
constitution in 2023 Assembly Joint Resolution 112, which became 2023 Enrolled Joint 
Resolution 16, and agreed to it by a majority of the members elected to each of the two houses, 
which proposed amendment reads as follows: 
Section 1. Section 10 (1) (c) of article V of the constitution is amended to read: 
[Article V] Section 10 (1) (c) In approving an appropriation bill in part, the governor may 
not create a new word by rejecting individual letters in the words of the enrolled bill, and may 
not create a new sentence by combining parts of 2 or more sentences of the enrolled bill, and 
may not create or increase or authorize the creation or increase of any tax or fee. 
Now, therefore, be it resolved by the senate, the assembly concurring, That the foregoing 
proposed amendment to the constitution is agreed to by the 2025 legislature; and, be it further 
Resolved, That the foregoing proposed amendment to the constitution be submitted to a vote of 
the people at the election to be held on the first Tuesday of November 2026; and, be it further 
Resolved, That the questions concerning ratification of the foregoing proposed amendment to the 
constitution be stated on the ballot as follows: 
QUESTION 1: “Partial veto. Shall section 10 (1) (c) of article V of the constitution be 
amended to prohibit the governor, in exercising his or her partial veto authority, from 
creating or increasing or authorizing the creation or increase of any tax or fee?” 
2025 Assembly Joint Resolution 10  
To amend section 18 of article I of the constitution; relating to: the freedom to gather in places 
of worship during a state of emergency. 
Whereas, the 2023 legislature in regular session considered a proposed amendment to the 
constitution in 2023 Senate Joint Resolution 54, which became 2023 Enrolled Joint Resolution 
11, and agreed to it by a majority of the members elected to each of the two houses, which 
proposed amendment reads as follows: 
Section 1. Section 18 of article I of the constitution is created to read: 
Notice of Referendum Election 
November 3, 2026 
[Article I] Section 18. The right of every person to worship Almighty God according to the 
dictates of conscience shall never be infringed; nor shall any person be compelled to attend, erect 
or support any place of worship, or to maintain any ministry, without consent; nor shall any 
control of, or interference with, the rights of conscience be permitted, or any preference be given 
by law to any religious establishments or modes of worship; nor shall any money be drawn from 
the treasury for the benefit of religious societies, or religious or theological seminaries; nor shall 
the state or a political subdivision of the state order the closure of or forbid gatherings in places 
of worship in response to a state of emergency at the national, state, or local level, including an 
emergency related to public health. 
Now, therefore, be it resolved by the assembly, the senate concurring, That the foregoing 
proposed amendments to the constitution is agreed to by the 2025 legislature; and, be it further 
Resolved, That the foregoing proposed amendments to the constitution be submitted to a vote of 
the people at the election to be held on the first Tuesday of November 2026; and, be it further 
Resolved, That the question concerning ratification of the foregoing proposed amendments to the 
constitution be stated on the ballot as follows: 
QUESTION 2: “Freedom to gather in places of worship during an emergency. Shall 
section 18 of article I of the constitution, which deals with religious liberty, be amended to 
prohibit the state or a political subdivision of the state from ordering the closure of, or 
forbidding gatherings in, places of worship in response to a state of emergency, including a 
public health emergency?” 
2025 Assembly Joint Resolution 102 
To create section 27 of article I of the constitution; relating to: prohibiting governmental entity 
discrimination. 
Whereas, the 2023 legislature in regular session considered a proposed amendment to the 
constitution in 2023 Assembly Joint Resolution 109, which became 2023 Enrolled Joint 
Resolution 15, and agreed to it by a majority of the members elected to each of the two houses, 
which proposed amendment reads as follows: 
Section 1. Section 27 of article I of the constitution is created to read: 
[Article I] Section 27 (1) In this section, “governmental entity” means the state, its political 
subdivisions including municipalities, the University of Wisconsin System, the Technical 
College System, any public college or university, any public school district, and any office, 
department, independent agency, board, commission, authority, institution, association, society, 
or other body in state or local government created or authorized to be created by the constitution 
or any law, including the legislature and the courts. 
(2) A governmental entity may not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, 
any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public 
employment, public education, public contracting, or public administration. 
2 
Notice of Referendum Election 
November 3, 2026 
(3) This section does not prohibit action that must be taken to establish or maintain 
eligibility for any federal program, if ineligibility would result in a loss of federal funds to the 
governmental entity. 
(4) Nothing in this section prohibits bona fide qualifications based on sex that are 
reasonably necessary to the normal operation of public employment, public education, public 
contracting, or public administration. 
(5) If any part or parts of this section are found to be in conflict with the United States 
Constitution or federal law, the section shall be implemented to the maximum extent that the 
United States Constitution and federal law permit. Any provision of this section held invalid 
shall be severable from the remaining portions of this section. 
Now, therefore, be it resolved by the assembly, the senate concurring, That the foregoing 
proposed amendments to the constitution is agreed to by the 2025 legislature; and, be it further 
Resolved, That the foregoing proposed amendments to the constitution be submitted to a vote of 
the people at the election to be held on the first Tuesday of November 2026; and, be it further 
Resolved, That the question concerning ratification of the foregoing proposed amendments to the 
constitution be stated on the ballot as follows: 
QUESTION 3: “Governmental entity discrimination prohibited. Shall section 27 of 
article I of the constitution be created to prohibit governmental entities in the state from 
discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group on 
the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, public 
education, public contracting, or public administration?” 
Explanatory Statements as to the Questions 
Explanatory statement regarding Question 1:  
Under current law, the Governor may partially veto language in a spending bill passed by the 
Legislature. The veto may result in either more or fewer taxes or fees being imposed and may 
also result in local government entities being authorized to increase or decrease local taxes or 
fees. 
The proposed amendment would add a new clause to Article V, section 10(1)(c) of the 
Wisconsin Constitution, providing that the Governor’s veto “may not create or increase or 
authorize the creation or increase of any tax or fee.” This language would not only prevent a veto 
from increasing any state taxes or fees, but also prevent a veto from allowing local governments, 
such as school districts, to increase their own taxes or fees. 
A “yes” vote on Question 1 would vote to amend Wis. Const. art. V, § 10(1)(c) to prohibit the 
Governor from partially vetoing a spending bill in a way that would create or increase or 
authorize the creation or increase of any tax or fee. 
A “no” vote on Question 1 would vote not to amend Wis. Const. art. V § 10(1)(c) of the 
Wisconsin Constitution. 
Explanatory statement regarding Question 2: 
3 
Notice of Referendum Election 
November 3, 2026 
Under current law, Article I, section 18 of the Wisconsin Constitution, like the First Amendment 
of the U.S. Constitution, protects religious rights. In a declared state of emergency, officials may 
limit public gatherings, including religious gatherings, so long as religious and secular gatherings 
are treated equivalently. 
The proposed amendment would add a new clause to the end of Article I, section 18, prohibiting 
the state and local governments from ordering the closure or forbidding gatherings “in places of 
worship” when there is a state of emergency. That language would prevent officials from 
forbidding gatherings in places of worship even when other types of public gatherings have been 
closed. 
A “yes” vote on Question 2 would vote to amend Wis. Const. art. I, § 18. The amendment would 
prohibit the state and local governments from closing or prohibiting gatherings in places of 
worship during a state of emergency. 
A “no” vote on Question 2 would vote not to amend Wis. Const. art. I, § 18 of the Wisconsin 
Constitution. 
Explanatory statement regarding Question 3: 
Under current law, both under Article I, section 1 of the Wisconsin Constitution and the Equal 
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, states and local 
governments may not discriminate based on race, ethnicity, color, national origin, or sex except 
under specific circumstances. For race, color, ethnicity, or national origin, discrimination in 
favor of or against a group is permissible only if the government has a compelling interest and a 
narrowly tailored remedy. For sex, discrimination is permissible if it serves an important 
government interest and is substantially related to that interest. Current law also makes 
distinctions depending on whether discrimination is overt and intentional, or merely a disparate 
impact of a neutral policy. 
The proposed amendment would create a new provision, Article I, section 27, which would 
prohibit state and local governmental entities from discriminating or granting preferential 
treatment based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, public 
education, public contracting, or public administration. 
This language appears to impose stricter standards against discrimination than the standards 
under current state and federal law. 
The amendment contains three exceptions. It does not apply if it would cause the governmental 
entity (1) to lose eligibility for a federal program or (2) to violate federal law. And the 
amendment’s prohibition on treating people differently based on sex does not apply to measures 
that are “reasonably necessary” to the “normal operation” of public employment, education, 
contracting, or administration. 
A “yes” vote on Question 3 would vote to create a new provision of the Wisconsin 
Constitution—Wis. Const. art. I, § 18, which would prohibit any governmental entity from 
4 
Notice of Referendum Election 
November 3, 2026 
discriminating or granting preferential treatment based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national 
origin in public employment, public education, public contracting, or public administration. 
A “no” vote on Question 3 would vote not to add Wis. Const. art. I § 18 to the 
Wisconsin Constitution.